Archive for the ‘ Training ’ Category


Wednesday, November 24th, 2021

Occasionally I read the weekly column written by Mike Hosking. I am not a great fan. Hosking’s views are too right wing for my taste. But the real turn off is his rubbish standard of English. It is beyond belief that he gets paid to churn out prose that my seven-year-old grandson would reject.

I notice Hosking’s Wikipedia page makes proud mention that Hosking left school when he was 16. I can believe that. Clearly his high school had taught him all they could.

On Tuesday Hosking wrote 400 words on opening New Zealand’s international border. Lists of his poor writing probably make for dull reading. However, bear with me. Here are several gems.

  1. In the first five lines the words “think” or “thought” are repeated five times. They say one measure of IQ is the frequency of repetition required for learning to take place. Clearly for Hosking that is quite a big number. Most of us got the idea we would have to think about the border the first time he said it. Hosking needs a reminder on every line.
  2. Central to Hosking’s argument is the damage New Zealand’s restricted border – Hosking calls it closed, but it is not – will have on students coming here for a university education. He says for example, “International education here was worth $5 billion a year” and “For Victoria and New South Wales, at least the planes arriving will soon be full of students”. His point is students filling our universities and paying fees is what New Zealand needs.

I would dearly love to know then why, a few lines after weeping tears about the lost students, Hosking decides to have a crack at the Prime Minister with this gem: “The theory, and this is the stuff you pick up when you spend half your life in university”. Oh dear, educating foreigners is fine. But for God’s sake not for a New Zealand female Prime Minister. She should be at home doing dishes and making the bed. What a moron Hosking is.

  • The genius Hoking then asks this question, “How is it that Australia can open its borders and we can’t?” Here again IQ is not a Hosking strong suit. The answer is Australia has a Prime Minister who enjoys cheating on the French, cheating in sport and killing his own people. Accept that and of course you can open the borders. New Zealand so far has had seven COVID deaths per million people. Australia has had 76, ten times more. My guess is that a few more deaths in South Auckland would not worry Hosking. As long as the border allowed Hoking to drink gin and tonic on the Gold Coast who cares about a few extra tangi in New Zealand? Not Hosking it seems.   
  • Then our Aristotle of immigration policy asks: “How is it they’re [that’s Australia] inviting hundreds of thousands into the country to fire up the economy and we haven’t? This cannot be true. Surely Hosking is not holding up Australian immigration policy as a shining beacon that New Zealand should follow. Or being stupid, perhaps he is.

Has Hosking never heard of the “white Australia policy”? He probably has, but thinks it was a good idea. Does he want New Zealand to have our own Manus Island to copy Australia’s Pacific Solution. Australia might be inviting “hundreds of thousands” but remember when they could not find space for one woman, Suhayra Aden, and her two children, all three of whom were all or partly Australian. Normally I hate this expression but really, if Hosking is so besotted with Australian immigration, he should pack his bags and go there. A few months on Manus Island would do him the world of good. I would certainly prefer Suhayra Aden and her two children to Mike Hosking any day. I am sure they present less danger to New Zealand than a loudmouth radio announcer.

She probably writes better English as well.


Monday, November 22nd, 2021

The previous Swimwatch post presented a case for the prosecution and a case for the defense in the Olivia Podmore suicide. Were Sport New Zealand and Cycling New Zealand (CNZ) guilty or innocent of aiding and abetting her death? Were their actions in breach of Section 179 of the Crimes Act 1961?

Each reader can, of course, make up their mind on that question. I have made a decision. I would vote – not guilty. And here is why.

Section 179 of the Crimes Act 1961 says,

179 Aiding and abetting suicide

Every one is liable to imprisonment who incites any person to commit suicide, if that person commits suicide in consequence thereof.

I feel Sport New Zealand and CNZ’s behaviour came close to being in breach of this law. However, they escape because Section 179 requires Sport New Zealand and CNZ to have the intent or the purpose that suicide would result from their behaviour. I do not believe that is the case. Sport New Zealand and CNZ should have seen the pressure they were applying to Olivia was incredibly dangerous. The fact they did not, is evidence of their blind arrogance and stupidity perhaps but not of an intent to cause suicide. And for that reason, my vote is not guilty.

However, not guilty on the charge of aiding and abetting suicide leaves the question – is there another law that does not require the same level of intent? Now remembering, I am not a lawyer, but I think there maybe another law that Sport New Zealand and CNZ’s need to answer – the law of Culpable Homicide. This is what that law says.

60 Culpable Homicide

Homicide is culpable when it consists in the killing of any person by causing that person by threats or by deception, to do an act which causes his or her death.

In my opinion, Sport New Zealand and CNZ committed this crime when they engaged in reckless conduct which created substantial jeopardy of severe trauma to Olivia Podmore. They got her involved in a nasty corporate cover-up. They forced her to lie by using an implied threat to her financial and sporting life. Under duress she went along with their demands. And then they failed to select her for the Tokyo Games. She gave them everything, including her good name, her self-esteem and her honour and Sport New Zealand and CNZ punished her for it.

Was that reckless conduct? It sure was. Reckless conduct is conduct that exhibits a disregard of foreseeable consequences to another (Olivia) from acts or omissions. Sport New Zealand and CNZ need not intentionally have caused the resulting harm to Olivia. The ultimate question is whether, under all the circumstances, the accused’s behaviour was sufficiently egregious that made it actually and imminently dangerous to Olivia’s rights and safety.

Too right, that is what they did. And so, with the provision of intent gone, the law of culpable homicide fits more easily with Olivia’s case. On that I would vote – guilty.

The purpose of this and the two previous Swimwatch posts is not for me to play lawyers. The purpose is to encourage real lawyers to look at the circumstances of Olivia’s death and determine whether a serious law has been broken. Lawyer or not, I find it difficult to believe that New Zealand does not have laws that protect us from the deception and dishonesty that caused Olivia’s death. For too long National Sporting Organisations have acted like petty dictatorships, free of any sanction for grievously bad behaviour.

It is surprising that an Olivia type tragedy has not happen before. Certainly swimming, canoeing and rowing have gone close. Olivia’s death made it a reality. Real lawyers must make case-law from her death. There has to be a “Harm Principle” law. There has to be a punishment. Athletes need protection. Crime, prosecution and punishment in a real Court are their best protection. We will see.

PS – The “Harm Principle” refers to a theory of crime that an action can be banned if it causes harm to someone.


Sunday, November 21st, 2021

Swimwatch readers may recall that our previous post suggested that Sport New Zealand and Cycling New Zealand (CNZ) were accessories to the suicide of Olivia Podmore. Here is what the post said.

“But make no mistake, in my opinion, whoever orchestrated the cover-up using Sport New Zealand’s money were accessories to her death and should be treated accordingly. Like some Mafia Don Sport New Zealand may not have been present when Podmore died but their greed and their money were responsible. At least they were in my opinion.”

So, what would happen if my opinion was tested in Court? I have no legal training and no experience of Court procedures. However, the balance of this post will discuss a possible case for the prosecution and a case for the defence.


The circumstances of Olivia Podmore’s suicide are covered in the Crimes Act 1961. Section 179 of the Act says.

Aiding and abetting suicide

Everyone is liable to imprisonment who incites, any person to commit suicide, if that person commits or attempts to commit suicide in consequence thereof.

The prosecution’s case is that Sport New Zealand’s money enabled CNZ to unreasonably subject Olivia to pressures that incited her to cause her own death. Both organisations grossly neglected their duty of care by inciting behaviour that they should have known could cause suicide in consequence thereof.

In particular,r senior CNZ staff members coerced Olivia to participate with CNZ in a fabricated cover-up of staff bad behaviour during pre-Rio-Olympic competition. Olivia was forced to lie for the organisation. The clear message of the CNZ conspiracy was that failure to comply would put at risk Sport New Zealand’s payment of Olivia’s training costs, overseas travel, accommodation, food, internal travel and her selection on national teams. Sport New Zealand and CNZ left a sensitive young woman with a choice between lying to the inquiry and preserving her only income and her sport or tell the truth and loose everything. Olivia chose the cover-up.

Two powerful organisations bullied Olivia into doing what she knew was wrong. They used their power to take advantage of a young athlete in their care. Two organisations that controlled everything she held dear used their power and their money for their own ends without a care for the consequences. Olivia was their victim.

But Sport New Zealand and CNZ were not done yet. Olivia gave them everything, including her reputation for honesty. In return CNZ failed to select her for the Tokyo Olympic Games. She had compromised her good name, her reputation and her self-esteem for them, and her reward was rejection. Olivia could not stand the pain inflicted directly on her by the actions of CNZ using Sport New Zealand’s money, and committed suicide.

The action of two all-powerful bullies was an incitement to suicide. CNZ and Sport New Zealand manipulated Olivia’s life and neglected their duty of care to an extent that the pain was an incitement for Olivia to take her own life.

Section 179 of the Crimes Act 1961 is in the Act for just this circumstance. Dangerous actions by CNZ, using Sport New Zealand’s money, directly encouraged Olivia to inflict self-harm. The jury’s decision should be guilty.    


The defence case is simple and very strong. In order to be convicted of aiding and abetting Olivia’s suicide the prosecution needs to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the intention of Sport New Zealand and CNZ was to cause her suicide. Sport New Zealand and CNZ have to be shown to have acted with that intention and must have premeditated the possibility of her suicide.

Sport New Zealand and CNZ could not reasonably predict that Olivia would take her life as a result of their actions. Some might argue that Sport New Zealand and CNZ should have seen her suicide as a consequence of their actions. However, they did not – and that is an acceptable defence.

The defence would also present the “Consent Defence” by arguing that no crime was committed because their actions were done with Olivia’s consent. In fact, the defence would argue that Olivia gave more than consent. She welcomed the money, the fame, the teams, the lifestyle and the training. She was a committed loyal member of the CNZ team. She had been published in cycling magazines and local papers supporting Sport New Zealand and CNZ.

How could either organisation possibly know she was on the verge of suicide when everything she said publicly supported them and her lifestyle? Since the day Olivia arrived in Cambridge the relationship with Sport New Zealand and CNZ had been warm and mutually beneficial. Every contact Sport New Zealand and CNZ had with Olivia had been for the purpose of making her life better and more successful. The money, the travel, the training and the facilities were provided for her support.

No one could have foreseen the tragedy that was about to unfold. The fact that it did does not make Sport New Zealand or CNZ guilty of aiding and abetting her suicide.

The jury’s decision should be not guilty


Readers who have got this far are the jury. It is for you to decide.


Friday, November 19th, 2021

Words fail to describe the rampant corruption – no, that is not too strong a word – that exists in New Zealand’s sport bureaucracy. As Sport New Zealand subverted democracy and bought its way into power in swimming the sport became increasingly dishonest. Many Swimwatch posts have relayed the deceit that characterised the years that followed. With the realisation that Sport New Zealand could not buy sporting success in swimming, they cut their annual grant by 60%. Today, Swimming New Zealand (SNZ) maybe poorer but character has always been more important than money. As each year goes by and the involvement of Sport New Zealand gets less and less, SNZ has become a cleaner and better place.

But Sport New Zealand never gave a moments thought to the question of whether their policy of financial control and centralised training might be flawed. Oh no, their reaction was to look for other prey. And before long Sport New Zealand was in bed with cycling.

And in the years that followed the same behaviour we saw in swimming has been evident in cycling. Investigation after investigation, report after report, a revolving door of coaches and CEOs, lie after lie and bad decisions like the recruitment of a hurdles athlete to cycle in the Commonwealth Games. Many times, I called swimming, Monty Python’s Flying Circus.

I could say the same thing about cycling, except this time it is far more serious than Monty Python. So serious that it ended the life of an Olympic athlete and, from all I’ve been told, a fine, hardworking, honest to a fault, gentle person, Olivia Podmore.

That is where Sport New Zealand’s money has taken the sport of cycling.

Before the Rio Olympic Games Olivia Podmore observed some bad behaviour involving a CNZ staff member and an athlete. No one will say but I assume a female athlete. After the Games the incident was investigated by CNZ. Podmore was asked to tell the investigation what she knew. But before giving her evidence she was pressured by someone to lie, to take part in a cover-up. Podmore was expected to protect cycling from the truth, to save the lifestyle of CNZ’s fat-cat bureaucrats.

What a terrible, terrible position for Podmore to be in. Her sport depended on these people. Her income depended on these people. Without their money she had no apartment, no food or drink and no sport. And so understandably she went along with the cover-up. Sport New Zealand’s money bought her silence.

Eventually the strain was too much, and Olivia Podmore took her life. But make no mistake, in my opinion, whoever orchestrated the cover-up using Sport New Zealand’s money were accessories to her death and should be treated accordingly. Like some Mafia Don Sport New Zealand may not have been present when Podmore died but their greed and their money were responsible. At least they were in my opinion.

Why do I feel that way? Because for 25 years Swimwatch fought similar abuse in swimming. Never with cycling’s tragic result. But career ending never-the-less. I wonder if anyone in CNZ thinks Sport New Zealand’s $5.3million last year was worth the price? I don’t think so. It never is.

And that brings us to an article published on the Stuff website earlier this week. The author, Zoe George, makes several important points about the progress of the Podmore investigation. The balance of this post will consider each of these.   

The inquiry into cycling is set to miss the first major deadline. A draft report was due before Christmas, but now it is expected to be delivered in February.

There is no excuse for this delay. Of course, COVID 19 restrictions in Cambridge are being blamed. However, the effect of the lockdown on Cambridge has been minimal. In addition, this first report is a preliminary draft. A progress document could have easily been produced using Skype or Zoom. The delay of two months is disrespectful to the primary purpose of the investigation. It certainly does not sit well when the panel bandy around Maori words like “hui” in their press release and disrespect the dead in their actions. Culturally sensitive? No, I don’t think so. The panel’s performance so far “F-“.    

The inquiry will address the impact of HPSNZ funding in cycling and whether having a centralised training hub in Cambridge is beneficial.

Are they really going to address this issue? They had better. Because in those 22 words lie the heart and soul of the problem. Cycling, rowing, canoeing and swimming can have every psychologist in the country working for them – but Sport New Zealand’s money corrupts and $5.3million a year corrupts absolutely. The CNZ investigation has a 25-year swimming case study at their fingertips. Eventually SNZ realised centralised training and a bank vault of money did not work and discarded the whole thing. Apart from Podmore’s death making it worse, why should the cause be any different. Years ago, the Ineson Report on swimming, prepared by Sport New Zealand, said what I am saying now. Sport New Zealand didn’t like that, so they discarded his findings. Another investigator was found to write what they wanted to read. The waste, the corruption and now the death continued.    

CNZ and HPSNZ “will ensure that no person who takes part in the Inquiry will be subjected to retaliation or retaliatory action and will “take all necessary measures to ensure the protection of anyone who cooperates, in good faith, with the panel.”

Does anyone really believe that’s true? Remember these are the guys who forced Podmore to lie in the first place. These are the guys who orchestrated the cover-up. When Sport New Zealand money is the prize, they would run over their grandmother if needed. If it were my son or daughter, I wouldn’t let him or her participate with these thugs. I’d deal directly with the lawyers but only if CNZ and HPSNZ were subject to the harshest controls. Do not trust them a second time.

Even their assurance to the athletes is qualified. “In good faith” – who decides what that means? This post has been written “in good faith” but CNZ and HPSNZ won’t think so. For 25 years, SNZ never thought any Swimwatch post was written “in good faith”. This new CNZ lot won’t be any different. Remember, $5.3million corrupts absolutely.


Wednesday, November 17th, 2021

While this COVID business is being sorted out swimming in New Zealand is a bit dire. Occasional swims in the sea are not ideal preparation for national pool swimming. All we can do is wait and see.

The lunatic fringe of swimming in New Zealand has another report on the “NZ Swim” Facebook page. I’ve read it but have no idea what it says. Something about when Level 69 becomes a purple traffic light we can put on Speedos and dance down Queen Street singing “Hare Krishna”. Swimmers in Wellington are asked to burn their traffic light pink fins at the top of Mt. Victoria. I think “NZ Swim” said water from Freyberg Pool, blessed by Lewis Clareburt, would be pumped up the hill to extinguish the blaze.  

Do not trust the rubbish published on that page. It is as reliable as a car I used to own called the “Blue Beast”. Fully loaded sheep trucks used to pass us going uphill on the Napier/Taupo road. As I have said before, when the Swimming New Zealand or Millennium websites says, “The pool opens at 6.00am on Monday the something or other,” I will be there.

There is no mileage in writing about swimming. So, what else is there to talk about? The “News Talk ZB” radio station is always fertile ground for sarcasm. Certainly, their relationship with the truth is about as distant as the “Blue Beast” was to reliable motoring. Today I heard them advertise themselves with a jingle that said something like, “All the views”. The inference was that their programmes would provide the listener with views from the political right, the middle and the left. Now that is simply not true.

The key six hours every day are dominated by two right-wing nutters, Hosking and du Plessis-Allan. They set the tone for much of the talk-back that follows. The Prime Minister did not abandon their radio station for no reason. She left because her plea for an end to child labour in Westport coal mines was being depicted as robbing pre-teens of their lunch money. If Mother Terresa voted Labour, “News Talk ZB” would find a way of linking her to the Pablo Escobar drug empire.

Last night du Plessis-Allan said that she would have to ask her boss about some outlandish right-wing opinion she was masquerading as news. Doesn’t she know we are well aware she is married to and sleeps with her boss. He’s a right-wing bigot as well. At least he is in my opinion. The suggestion that asking him is consulting some independent source is pathetic.

Finally in this week of little swimming news, I hear on tonight’s TV One sport’s news that a 400m hurdles athlete called French has been recruited by Cycling New Zealand’s (CNZ) centralised training organisation to join their sprint team. One of New Zealand’s best sports reporters, Abby Wilson, asked the CYC Head Coach why was a runner selected? Wasn’t their talent available within cycling?

“Not really,” said the coach. “We could not find the talent here, so we went out to athletics, rowing and bobsleigh.” I expected him to widen the search by adding chess, darts and ten pin bowling. But what a put-down of cycling. Last year Sport New Zealand spent $5,394,298 on cycling. Sponsorships coughed up another $1,143,797. That is money that indirectly came from you and me.

$6.5million and CNZ’s centralised program can’t find a cyclist for the national team without looting any other sport they can find. It is swimming’s centralised problems all over again. My guess is no one will see it as a problem before it is too late. And when the new recruit plucked from a Las Vegas poker table fails to fire in the Birmingham Commonwealth Games’ men’s sprint, Sport New Zealand will blame the athletes. Or perhaps they were delt a bad hand. When Sport New Zealand’s money was the root cause all along. Just as it was in the tragic decision made by Olivia Podmore. But what are the odds of that ever being said by the current investigation into her death?

Just as swimming was a mess before it ditched the whole Sport New Zealand circus, cycling is being lured into the same dark, deep hole. Deaths and bizarre recruitments are just the beginning. It will not end well.

And, on an uplifting note, I am off with Eyad and Alex for a swim at Takapuna Beach tomorrow morning. The weather forecast is good. A takeaway coffee and donut from the Takapuna Café should start the day off well. Especially now that Jacinda has said that by mid-December we might be starting to climb out of this COVID mess. Fingers crossed.